9p: add more conservative locking
During the reorganization some of the multi-theaded locking assumptions were accidently relaxed. This patch moves us back towards a more conservative locking strategy. Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0a0ac2ee5
commit
7eb923b80c
@ -188,8 +188,16 @@ static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_conn *m, int err)
|
|||||||
LIST_HEAD(cancel_list);
|
LIST_HEAD(cancel_list);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "mux %p err %d\n", m, err);
|
P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "mux %p err %d\n", m, err);
|
||||||
m->err = err;
|
|
||||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&m->client->lock, flags);
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&m->client->lock, flags);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (m->err) {
|
||||||
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->client->lock, flags);
|
||||||
|
return;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
m->err = err;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(req, rtmp, &m->req_list, req_list) {
|
list_for_each_entry_safe(req, rtmp, &m->req_list, req_list) {
|
||||||
req->status = REQ_STATUS_ERROR;
|
req->status = REQ_STATUS_ERROR;
|
||||||
if (!req->t_err)
|
if (!req->t_err)
|
||||||
@ -352,8 +360,9 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
|||||||
/* not an else because some packets (like clunk) have no payload */
|
/* not an else because some packets (like clunk) have no payload */
|
||||||
if ((m->req) && (m->rpos == m->rsize)) { /* packet is read in */
|
if ((m->req) && (m->rpos == m->rsize)) { /* packet is read in */
|
||||||
P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_TRANS, "got new packet\n");
|
P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_TRANS, "got new packet\n");
|
||||||
|
spin_lock(&m->client->lock);
|
||||||
list_del(&m->req->req_list);
|
list_del(&m->req->req_list);
|
||||||
|
spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
|
||||||
p9_client_cb(m->client, m->req);
|
p9_client_cb(m->client, m->req);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
m->rbuf = NULL;
|
m->rbuf = NULL;
|
||||||
@ -651,9 +660,8 @@ static int p9_fd_request(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
|
|||||||
if (m->err < 0)
|
if (m->err < 0)
|
||||||
return m->err;
|
return m->err;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
req->status = REQ_STATUS_UNSENT;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
spin_lock(&client->lock);
|
spin_lock(&client->lock);
|
||||||
|
req->status = REQ_STATUS_UNSENT;
|
||||||
list_add_tail(&req->req_list, &m->unsent_req_list);
|
list_add_tail(&req->req_list, &m->unsent_req_list);
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&client->lock);
|
spin_unlock(&client->lock);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -672,19 +680,21 @@ static int p9_fd_cancel(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
|
|||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct p9_trans_fd *ts = client->trans;
|
struct p9_trans_fd *ts = client->trans;
|
||||||
struct p9_conn *m = ts->conn;
|
struct p9_conn *m = ts->conn;
|
||||||
|
int ret = 1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_TRANS, "mux %p req %p\n", m, req);
|
P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_TRANS, "mux %p req %p\n", m, req);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
spin_lock(&client->lock);
|
spin_lock(&client->lock);
|
||||||
list_del(&req->req_list);
|
list_del(&req->req_list);
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&client->lock);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_UNSENT) {
|
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_UNSENT) {
|
||||||
req->status = REQ_STATUS_FLSHD;
|
req->status = REQ_STATUS_FLSHD;
|
||||||
return 0;
|
ret = 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return 1;
|
spin_unlock(&client->lock);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return ret;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user