commit 4c59406ed00379c8663f8663d82b2537467ce9d7 upstream.
After xfrm_add_policy add a policy, its ref is 2, then
xfrm_policy_timer
read_lock
xp->walk.dead is 0
....
mod_timer()
xfrm_policy_kill
policy->walk.dead = 1
....
del_timer(&policy->timer)
xfrm_pol_put //ref is 1
xfrm_pol_put //ref is 0
xfrm_policy_destroy
call_rcu
xfrm_pol_hold //ref is 1
read_unlock
xfrm_pol_put //ref is 0
xfrm_policy_destroy
call_rcu
xfrm_policy_destroy is called twice, which may leads to
double free.
Call Trace:
RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x161/0x210
...
xfrm_policy_timer+0x522/0x600
call_timer_fn+0x1b3/0x5e0
? __xfrm_decode_session+0x2990/0x2990
? msleep+0xb0/0xb0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40
? __xfrm_decode_session+0x2990/0x2990
? __xfrm_decode_session+0x2990/0x2990
run_timer_softirq+0x5c5/0x10e0
Fix this by use write_lock_bh in xfrm_policy_kill.
Fixes: ea2dea9dacc2 ("xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@iki.fi>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit a1a7e3a36e01ca6e67014f8cf673cb8e47be5550 upstream.
Without doing verify_sec_ctx_len() check in xfrm_add_acquire(), it may be
out-of-bounds to access uctx->ctx_str with uctx->ctx_len, as noticed by
syz:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in selinux_xfrm_alloc_user+0x237/0x430
Read of size 768 at addr ffff8880123be9b4 by task syz-executor.1/11650
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xe8/0x16e
print_address_description.cold.3+0x9/0x23b
kasan_report.cold.4+0x64/0x95
memcpy+0x1f/0x50
selinux_xfrm_alloc_user+0x237/0x430
security_xfrm_policy_alloc+0x5c/0xb0
xfrm_policy_construct+0x2b1/0x650
xfrm_add_acquire+0x21d/0xa10
xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x431/0x6f0
netlink_rcv_skb+0x15a/0x410
xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90
netlink_unicast+0x50e/0x6a0
netlink_sendmsg+0x8ae/0xd40
sock_sendmsg+0x133/0x170
___sys_sendmsg+0x834/0x9a0
__sys_sendmsg+0x100/0x1e0
do_syscall_64+0xe5/0x660
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf
So fix it by adding the missing verify_sec_ctx_len check there.
Fixes: 980ebd25794f ("[IPSEC]: Sync series - acquire insert")
Reported-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 171d449a028573b2f0acdc7f31ecbb045391b320 upstream.
It's not sufficient to do 'uctx->len != (sizeof(struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx) +
uctx->ctx_len)' check only, as uctx->len may be greater than nla_len(rt),
in which case it will cause slab-out-of-bounds when accessing uctx->ctx_str
later.
This patch is to fix it by return -EINVAL when uctx->len > nla_len(rt).
Fixes: df71837d5024 ("[LSM-IPSec]: Security association restriction.")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit dbb2483b2a46fbaf833cfb5deb5ed9cace9c7399 upstream.
In commit 6a53b7593233 ("xfrm: check id proto in validate_tmpl()")
I introduced a check for xfrm protocol, but according to Herbert
IPSEC_PROTO_ANY should only be used as a wildcard for lookup, so
it should be removed from validate_tmpl().
And, IPSEC_PROTO_ANY is expected to only match 3 IPSec-specific
protocols, this is why xfrm_state_flush() could still miss
IPPROTO_ROUTING, which leads that those entries are left in
net->xfrm.state_all before exit net. Fix this by replacing
IPSEC_PROTO_ANY with zero.
This patch also extracts the check from validate_tmpl() to
xfrm_id_proto_valid() and uses it in parse_ipsecrequest().
With this, no other protocols should be added into xfrm.
Fixes: 6a53b7593233 ("xfrm: check id proto in validate_tmpl()")
Reported-by: syzbot+0bf0519d6e0de15914fe@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Zubin Mithra <zsm@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b8d6d0079757cbd1b69724cfd1c08e2171c68cee ]
After commit b38ff4075a80, the following command does not work anymore:
$ ip xfrm state add src 10.125.0.2 dst 10.125.0.1 proto esp spi 34 reqid 1 \
mode tunnel enc 'cbc(aes)' 0xb0abdba8b782ad9d364ec81e3a7d82a1 auth-trunc \
'hmac(sha1)' 0xe26609ebd00acb6a4d51fca13e49ea78a72c73e6 96 flag align4
In fact, the selector is not mandatory, allow the user to provide an empty
selector.
Fixes: b38ff4075a80 ("xfrm: Fix xfrm sel prefix length validation")
CC: Anirudh Gupta <anirudh.gupta@sophos.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b38ff4075a80b4da5cb2202d7965332ca0efb213 ]
Family of src/dst can be different from family of selector src/dst.
Use xfrm selector family to validate address prefix length,
while verifying new sa from userspace.
Validated patch with this command:
ip xfrm state add src 1.1.6.1 dst 1.1.6.2 proto esp spi 4260196 \
reqid 20004 mode tunnel aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" \
0x1111016400000000000000000000000044440001 128 \
sel src 1011:1:4::2/128 sel dst 1021:1:4::2/128 dev Port5
Fixes: 07bf7908950a ("xfrm: Validate address prefix lengths in the xfrm selector.")
Signed-off-by: Anirudh Gupta <anirudh.gupta@sophos.com>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b805d78d300bcf2c83d6df7da0c818b0fee41427 ]
UBSAN report this:
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1289:24
index 6 is out of range for type 'unsigned int [6]'
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.4.162-514.55.6.9.x86_64+ #13
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
0000000000000000 1466cf39b41b23c9 ffff8801f6b07a58 ffffffff81cb35f4
0000000041b58ab3 ffffffff83230f9c ffffffff81cb34e0 ffff8801f6b07a80
ffff8801f6b07a20 1466cf39b41b23c9 ffffffff851706e0 ffff8801f6b07ae8
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff81cb35f4>] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 [inline]
<IRQ> [<ffffffff81cb35f4>] dump_stack+0x114/0x1a0 lib/dump_stack.c:51
[<ffffffff81d94225>] ubsan_epilogue+0x12/0x8f lib/ubsan.c:164
[<ffffffff81d954db>] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x16e/0x1b2 lib/ubsan.c:382
[<ffffffff82a25acd>] __xfrm_policy_unlink+0x3dd/0x5b0 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1289
[<ffffffff82a2e572>] xfrm_policy_delete+0x52/0xb0 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1309
[<ffffffff82a3319b>] xfrm_policy_timer+0x30b/0x590 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:243
[<ffffffff813d3927>] call_timer_fn+0x237/0x990 kernel/time/timer.c:1144
[<ffffffff813d8e7e>] __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1218 [inline]
[<ffffffff813d8e7e>] run_timer_softirq+0x6ce/0xb80 kernel/time/timer.c:1401
[<ffffffff8120d6f9>] __do_softirq+0x299/0xe10 kernel/softirq.c:273
[<ffffffff8120e676>] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:350 [inline]
[<ffffffff8120e676>] irq_exit+0x216/0x2c0 kernel/softirq.c:391
[<ffffffff82c5edab>] exiting_irq arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h:652 [inline]
[<ffffffff82c5edab>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8b/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:926
[<ffffffff82c5c985>] apic_timer_interrupt+0xa5/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:735
<EOI> [<ffffffff81188096>] ? native_safe_halt+0x6/0x10 arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:52
[<ffffffff810834d7>] arch_safe_halt arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:111 [inline]
[<ffffffff810834d7>] default_idle+0x27/0x430 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:446
[<ffffffff81085f05>] arch_cpu_idle+0x15/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:437
[<ffffffff8132abc3>] default_idle_call+0x53/0x90 kernel/sched/idle.c:92
[<ffffffff8132b32d>] cpuidle_idle_call kernel/sched/idle.c:156 [inline]
[<ffffffff8132b32d>] cpu_idle_loop kernel/sched/idle.c:251 [inline]
[<ffffffff8132b32d>] cpu_startup_entry+0x60d/0x9a0 kernel/sched/idle.c:299
[<ffffffff8113e119>] start_secondary+0x3c9/0x560 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:245
The issue is triggered as this:
xfrm_add_policy
-->verify_newpolicy_info //check the index provided by user with XFRM_POLICY_MAX
//In my case, the index is 0x6E6BB6, so it pass the check.
-->xfrm_policy_construct //copy the user's policy and set xfrm_policy_timer
-->xfrm_policy_insert
--> __xfrm_policy_link //use the orgin dir, in my case is 2
--> xfrm_gen_index //generate policy index, there is 0x6E6BB6
then xfrm_policy_timer be fired
xfrm_policy_timer
--> xfrm_policy_id2dir //get dir from (policy index & 7), in my case is 6
--> xfrm_policy_delete
--> __xfrm_policy_unlink //access policy_count[dir], trigger out of range access
Add xfrm_policy_id2dir check in verify_newpolicy_info, make sure the computed dir is
valid, to fix the issue.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Fixes: e682adf021be ("xfrm: Try to honor policy index if it's supplied by user")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
