Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chao Yu
7f99a660cd f2fs: fix to do sanity check on valid block count of segment
[ Upstream commit e95bcdb2fefa129f37bd9035af1d234ca92ee4ef ]

As Jungyeon reported in bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203233

- Overview
When mounting the attached crafted image and running program, following errors are reported.
Additionally, it hangs on sync after running program.

The image is intentionally fuzzed from a normal f2fs image for testing.
Compile options for F2FS are as follows.
CONFIG_F2FS_FS=y
CONFIG_F2FS_STAT_FS=y
CONFIG_F2FS_FS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_F2FS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS=y

- Reproduces
cc poc_13.c
mkdir test
mount -t f2fs tmp.img test
cp a.out test
cd test
sudo ./a.out
sync

- Kernel messages
 F2FS-fs (sdb): Bitmap was wrongly set, blk:4608
 kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2102!
 RIP: 0010:update_sit_entry+0x394/0x410
 Call Trace:
  f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x16f/0x660
  do_write_page+0x62/0x170
  f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x33/0xa0
  __write_node_page+0x270/0x4e0
  f2fs_sync_node_pages+0x5df/0x670
  f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x372/0x1400
  f2fs_sync_fs+0xa3/0x130
  f2fs_do_sync_file+0x1a6/0x810
  do_fsync+0x33/0x60
  __x64_sys_fsync+0xb/0x10
  do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

sit.vblocks and sum valid block count in sit.valid_map may be
inconsistent, segment w/ zero vblocks will be treated as free
segment, while allocating in free segment, we may allocate a
free block, if its bitmap is valid previously, it can cause
kernel crash due to bitmap verification failure.

Anyway, to avoid further serious metadata inconsistence and
corruption, it is necessary and worth to detect SIT
inconsistence. So let's enable check_block_count() to verify
vblocks and valid_map all the time rather than do it only
CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-06 19:01:57 +02:00
Chao Yu
5790a29747 f2fs: fix to avoid panic in do_recover_data()
[ Upstream commit 22d61e286e2d9097dae36f75ed48801056b77cac ]

As Jungyeon reported in bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203227

- Overview
When mounting the attached crafted image, following errors are reported.
Additionally, it hangs on sync after trying to mount it.

The image is intentionally fuzzed from a normal f2fs image for testing.
Compile options for F2FS are as follows.
CONFIG_F2FS_FS=y
CONFIG_F2FS_STAT_FS=y
CONFIG_F2FS_FS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_F2FS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS=y

- Reproduces
mkdir test
mount -t f2fs tmp.img test
sync

- Messages
 kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/recovery.c:549!
 RIP: 0010:recover_data+0x167a/0x1780
 Call Trace:
  f2fs_recover_fsync_data+0x613/0x710
  f2fs_fill_super+0x1043/0x1aa0
  mount_bdev+0x16d/0x1a0
  mount_fs+0x4a/0x170
  vfs_kern_mount+0x5d/0x100
  do_mount+0x200/0xcf0
  ksys_mount+0x79/0xc0
  __x64_sys_mount+0x1c/0x20
  do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

During recovery, if ofs_of_node is inconsistent in between recovered
node page and original checkpointed node page, let's just fail recovery
instead of making kernel panic.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-06 19:01:55 +02:00
Sahitya Tummala
80945a693f f2fs: do not use mutex lock in atomic context
[ Upstream commit 9083977dabf3833298ddcd40dee28687f1e6b483 ]

Fix below warning coming because of using mutex lock in atomic context.

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:98
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 585, name: sh
Preemption disabled at: __radix_tree_preload+0x28/0x130
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2b4
 show_stack+0x20/0x28
 dump_stack+0xa8/0xe0
 ___might_sleep+0x144/0x194
 __might_sleep+0x58/0x8c
 mutex_lock+0x2c/0x48
 f2fs_trace_pid+0x88/0x14c
 f2fs_set_node_page_dirty+0xd0/0x184

Do not use f2fs_radix_tree_insert() to avoid doing cond_resched() with
spin_lock() acquired.

Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-06 14:24:14 +02:00
prashantpaddune
3bca37f224 A750FXXU4CTBC 2020-03-27 21:51:54 +05:30