Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Linus Torvalds
66d4291267 signal: avoid double atomic counter increments for user accounting
[ Upstream commit fda31c50292a5062332fa0343c084bd9f46604d9 ]

When queueing a signal, we increment both the users count of pending
signals (for RLIMIT_SIGPENDING tracking) and we increment the refcount
of the user struct itself (because we keep a reference to the user in
the signal structure in order to correctly account for it when freeing).

That turns out to be fairly expensive, because both of them are atomic
updates, and particularly under extreme signal handling pressure on big
machines, you can get a lot of cache contention on the user struct.
That can then cause horrid cacheline ping-pong when you do these
multiple accesses.

So change the reference counting to only pin the user for the _first_
pending signal, and to unpin it when the last pending signal is
dequeued.  That means that when a user sees a lot of concurrent signal
queuing - which is the only situation when this matters - the only
atomic access needed is generally the 'sigpending' count update.

This was noticed because of a particularly odd timing artifact on a
dual-socket 96C/192T Cascade Lake platform: when you get into bad
contention, on that machine for some reason seems to be much worse when
the contention happens in the upper 32-byte half of the cacheline.

As a result, the kernel test robot will-it-scale 'signal1' benchmark had
an odd performance regression simply due to random alignment of the
'struct user_struct' (and pointed to a completely unrelated and
apparently nonsensical commit for the regression).

Avoiding the double increments (and decrements on the dequeueing side,
of course) makes for much less contention and hugely improved
performance on that will-it-scale microbenchmark.

Quoting Feng Tang:

 "It makes a big difference, that the performance score is tripled! bump
  from original 17000 to 54000. Also the gap between 5.0-rc6 and
  5.0-rc6+Jiri's patch is reduced to around 2%"

[ The "2% gap" is the odd cacheline placement difference on that
  platform: under the extreme contention case, the effect of which half
  of the cacheline was hot was 5%, so with the reduced contention the
  odd timing artifact is reduced too ]

It does help in the non-contended case too, but is not nearly as
noticeable.

Reported-and-tested-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-07 14:13:36 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman
4ab4bf67b6 signal: Allow cifs and drbd to receive their terminating signals
[ Upstream commit 33da8e7c814f77310250bb54a9db36a44c5de784 ]

My recent to change to only use force_sig for a synchronous events
wound up breaking signal reception cifs and drbd.  I had overlooked
the fact that by default kthreads start out with all signals set to
SIG_IGN.  So a change I thought was safe turned out to have made it
impossible for those kernel thread to catch their signals.

Reverting the work on force_sig is a bad idea because what the code
was doing was very much a misuse of force_sig.  As the way force_sig
ultimately allowed the signal to happen was to change the signal
handler to SIG_DFL.  Which after the first signal will allow userspace
to send signals to these kernel threads.  At least for
wake_ack_receiver in drbd that does not appear actively wrong.

So correct this problem by adding allow_kernel_signal that will allow
signals whose siginfo reports they were sent by the kernel through,
but will not allow userspace generated signals, and update cifs and
drbd to call allow_kernel_signal in an appropriate place so that their
thread can receive this signal.

Fixing things this way ensures that userspace won't be able to send
signals and cause problems, that it is clear which signals the
threads are expecting to receive, and it guarantees that nothing
else in the system will be affected.

This change was partly inspired by similar cifs and drbd patches that
added allow_signal.

Reported-by: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
Tested-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Cc: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Fixes: 247bc9470b1e ("cifs: fix rmmod regression in cifs.ko caused by force_sig changes")
Fixes: 72abe3bcf091 ("signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of force_sig")
Fixes: fee109901f39 ("signal/drbd: Use send_sig not force_sig")
Fixes: 3cf5d076fb4d ("signal: Remove task parameter from force_sig")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-07 13:42:54 +02:00
Eric W. Biederman
4e25b4057b signal: Always ignore SIGKILL and SIGSTOP sent to the global init
[ Upstream commit 86989c41b5ea08776c450cb759592532314a4ed6 ]

If the first process started (aka /sbin/init) receives a SIGKILL it
will panic the system if it is delivered.  Making the system unusable
and undebugable.  It isn't much better if the first process started
receives SIGSTOP.

So always ignore SIGSTOP and SIGKILL sent to init.

This is done in a separate clause in sig_task_ignored as force_sig_info
can clear SIG_UNKILLABLE and this protection should work even then.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-07 12:27:21 +02:00
Zhenliang Wei
00b3d14be3 kernel/signal.c: trace_signal_deliver when signal_group_exit
commit 98af37d624ed8c83f1953b1b6b2f6866011fc064 upstream.

In the fixes commit, removing SIGKILL from each thread signal mask and
executing "goto fatal" directly will skip the call to
"trace_signal_deliver".  At this point, the delivery tracking of the
SIGKILL signal will be inaccurate.

Therefore, we need to add trace_signal_deliver before "goto fatal" after
executing sigdelset.

Note: SEND_SIG_NOINFO matches the fact that SIGKILL doesn't have any info.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190425025812.91424-1-weizhenliang@huawei.com
Fixes: cf43a757fd4944 ("signal: Restore the stop PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT")
Signed-off-by: Zhenliang Wei <weizhenliang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Ivan Delalande <colona@arista.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-04-06 18:21:39 +02:00
prashantpaddune
3bca37f224 A750FXXU4CTBC 2020-03-27 21:51:54 +05:30