[ Upstream commit 4638faac032756f7eab5524be7be56bee77e426b ]
sock_efree() releases the sock refcnt, if we don't hold this refcnt
when setting skb->destructor to it, the refcnt would not be balanced.
This leads to several bug reports from syzbot.
I have checked other users of sock_efree(), all of them hold the
sock refcnt.
Fixes: c8c8218ec5af ("netrom: fix a memory leak in nr_rx_frame()")
Reported-and-tested-by: <syzbot+622bdabb128acc33427d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: <syzbot+6eaef7158b19e3fec3a0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: <syzbot+9399c158fcc09b21d0d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: <syzbot+a34e5f3d0300163f0c87@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit c8c8218ec5af5d2598381883acbefbf604e56b5e ]
When the skb is associated with a new sock, just assigning
it to skb->sk is not sufficient, we have to set its destructor
to free the sock properly too.
Reported-by: syzbot+d6636a36d3c34bd88938@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
