[ Upstream commit e260ad01f0aa9e96b5386d5cd7184afd949dc457 ]
Currently when userspace gives us a values that overflow e.g. file-max
and other callers of __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax() we simply ignore the
new value and leave the current value untouched.
This can be problematic as it gives the illusion that the limit has
indeed be bumped when in fact it failed. This commit makes sure to
return EINVAL when an overflow is detected. Please note that this is a
userspace facing change.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190210203943.8227-4-christian@brauner.io
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 9002b21465fa4d829edfc94a5a441005cffaa972 upstream.
Commit 32a5ad9c2285 ("sysctl: handle overflow for file-max") hooked up
min/max values for the file-max sysctl parameter via the .extra1 and
.extra2 fields in the corresponding struct ctl_table entry.
Unfortunately, the minimum value points at the global 'zero' variable,
which is an int. This results in a KASAN splat when accessed as a long
by proc_doulongvec_minmax on 64-bit architectures:
| BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x5d8/0x6a0
| Read of size 8 at addr ffff2000133d1c20 by task systemd/1
|
| CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 5.1.0-rc3-00012-g40b114779944 #2
| Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
| Call trace:
| dump_backtrace+0x0/0x228
| show_stack+0x14/0x20
| dump_stack+0xe8/0x124
| print_address_description+0x60/0x258
| kasan_report+0x140/0x1a0
| __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x18/0x20
| __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x5d8/0x6a0
| proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x4c/0x78
| proc_sys_call_handler.isra.19+0x144/0x1d8
| proc_sys_write+0x34/0x58
| __vfs_write+0x54/0xe8
| vfs_write+0x124/0x3c0
| ksys_write+0xbc/0x168
| __arm64_sys_write+0x68/0x98
| el0_svc_common+0x100/0x258
| el0_svc_handler+0x48/0xc0
| el0_svc+0x8/0xc
|
| The buggy address belongs to the variable:
| zero+0x0/0x40
|
| Memory state around the buggy address:
| ffff2000133d1b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa
| ffff2000133d1b80: fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa
| >ffff2000133d1c00: fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00
| ^
| ffff2000133d1c80: fa fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00
| ffff2000133d1d00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Fix the splat by introducing a unsigned long 'zero_ul' and using that
instead.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403153409.17307-1-will.deacon@arm.com
Fixes: 32a5ad9c2285 ("sysctl: handle overflow for file-max")
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 32a5ad9c22852e6bd9e74bdec5934ef9d1480bc5 ]
Currently, when writing
echo 18446744073709551616 > /proc/sys/fs/file-max
/proc/sys/fs/file-max will overflow and be set to 0. That quickly
crashes the system.
This commit sets the max and min value for file-max. The max value is
set to long int. Any higher value cannot currently be used as the
percpu counters are long ints and not unsigned integers.
Note that the file-max value is ultimately parsed via
__do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(). This function does not report error when
min or max are exceeded. Which means if a value largen that long int is
written userspace will not receive an error instead the old value will be
kept. There is an argument to be made that this should be changed and
__do_proc_doulongvec_minmax() should return an error when a dedicated min
or max value are exceeded. However this has the potential to break
userspace so let's defer this to an RFC patch.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190107222700.15954-3-christian@brauner.io
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
[christian@brauner.io: v4]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190210203943.8227-3-christian@brauner.io
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
