Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
zhengbin
92ef826be3 nfsd: Return EPERM, not EACCES, in some SETATTR cases
[ Upstream commit 255fbca65137e25b12bced18ec9a014dc77ecda0 ]

As the man(2) page for utime/utimes states, EPERM is returned when the
second parameter of utime or utimes is not NULL, the caller's effective UID
does not match the owner of the file, and the caller is not privileged.

However, in a NFS directory mounted from knfsd, it will return EACCES
(from nfsd_setattr-> fh_verify->nfsd_permission).  This patch fixes
that.

Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-07 12:45:30 +02:00
Scott Mayhew
ed04022991 nfsd: fix a warning in __cld_pipe_upcall()
[ Upstream commit b493fd31c0b89d9453917e977002de58bebc3802 ]

__cld_pipe_upcall() emits a "do not call blocking ops when
!TASK_RUNNING" warning due to the dput() call in rpc_queue_upcall().
Fix it by using a completion instead of hand coding the wait.

Signed-off-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-07 12:45:05 +02:00
Paul Menzel
c2f3b34a6e nfsd: Fix overflow causing non-working mounts on 1 TB machines
[ Upstream commit 3b2d4dcf71c4a91b420f835e52ddea8192300a3b ]

Since commit 10a68cdf10 (nfsd: fix performance-limiting session
calculation) (Linux 5.1-rc1 and 4.19.31), shares from NFS servers with
1 TB of memory cannot be mounted anymore. The mount just hangs on the
client.

The gist of commit 10a68cdf10 is the change below.

    -avail = clamp_t(int, avail, slotsize, avail/3);
    +avail = clamp_t(int, avail, slotsize, total_avail/3);

Here are the macros.

    #define min_t(type, x, y)       __careful_cmp((type)(x), (type)(y), <)
    #define clamp_t(type, val, lo, hi) min_t(type, max_t(type, val, lo), hi)

`total_avail` is 8,434,659,328 on the 1 TB machine. `clamp_t()` casts
the values to `int`, which for 32-bit integers can only hold values
−2,147,483,648 (−2^31) through 2,147,483,647 (2^31 − 1).

`avail` (in the function signature) is just 65536, so that no overflow
was happening. Before the commit the assignment would result in 21845,
and `num = 4`.

When using `total_avail`, it is causing the assignment to be
18446744072226137429 (printed as %lu), and `num` is then 4164608182.

My next guess is, that `nfsd_drc_mem_used` is then exceeded, and the
server thinks there is no memory available any more for this client.

Updating the arguments of `clamp_t()` and `min_t()` to `unsigned long`
fixes the issue.

Now, `avail = 65536` (before commit 10a68cdf10 `avail = 21845`), but
`num = 4` remains the same.

Fixes: c54f24e338ed (nfsd: fix performance-limiting session calculation)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-06 20:05:44 +02:00
J. Bruce Fields
62a52f49f0 nfsd: fix performance-limiting session calculation
[ Upstream commit c54f24e338ed2a35218f117a4a1afb5f9e2b4e64 ]

We're unintentionally limiting the number of slots per nfsv4.1 session
to 10.  Often more than 10 simultaneous RPCs are needed for the best
performance.

This calculation was meant to prevent any one client from using up more
than a third of the limit we set for total memory use across all clients
and sessions.  Instead, it's limiting the client to a third of the
maximum for a single session.

Fix this.

Reported-by: Chris Tracy <ctracy@engr.scu.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: de766e570413 "nfsd: give out fewer session slots as limit approaches"
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-06 20:05:42 +02:00
J. Bruce Fields
525ae73b94 nfsd: give out fewer session slots as limit approaches
[ Upstream commit de766e570413bd0484af0b580299b495ada625c3 ]

Instead of granting client's full requests until we hit our DRC size
limit and then failing CREATE_SESSIONs (and hence mounts) completely,
start granting clients smaller slot tables as we approach the limit.

The factor chosen here is pretty much arbitrary.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-06 20:05:40 +02:00
J. Bruce Fields
8a65cfd2ee nfsd: increase DRC cache limit
[ Upstream commit 44d8660d3bb0a1c8363ebcb906af2343ea8e15f6 ]

An NFSv4.1+ client negotiates the size of its duplicate reply cache size
in the initial CREATE_SESSION request.  The server preallocates the
memory for the duplicate reply cache to ensure that we'll never fail to
record the response to a nonidempotent operation.

To prevent a few CREATE_SESSIONs from consuming all of memory we set an
upper limit based on nr_free_buffer_pages().  1/2^10 has been too
limiting in practice; 1/2^7 is still less than one percent.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-06 20:05:38 +02:00
J. Bruce Fields
52a9c506d9 nfsd: allow fh_want_write to be called twice
[ Upstream commit 0b8f62625dc309651d0efcb6a6247c933acd8b45 ]

A fuzzer recently triggered lockdep warnings about potential sb_writers
deadlocks caused by fh_want_write().

Looks like we aren't careful to pair each fh_want_write() with an
fh_drop_write().

It's not normally a problem since fh_put() will call fh_drop_write() for
us.  And was OK for NFSv3 where we'd do one operation that might call
fh_want_write(), and then put the filehandle.

But an NFSv4 protocol fuzzer can do weird things like call unlink twice
in a compound, and then we get into trouble.

I'm a little worried about this approach of just leaving everything to
fh_put().  But I think there are probably a lot of
fh_want_write()/fh_drop_write() imbalances so for now I think we need it
to be more forgiving.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-04-06 19:02:07 +02:00
Trond Myklebust
4010723dfd nfsd: Don't release the callback slot unless it was actually held
commit e6abc8caa6deb14be2a206253f7e1c5e37e9515b upstream.

If there are multiple callbacks queued, waiting for the callback
slot when the callback gets shut down, then they all currently
end up acting as if they hold the slot, and call
nfsd4_cb_sequence_done() resulting in interesting side-effects.

In addition, the 'retry_nowait' path in nfsd4_cb_sequence_done()
causes a loop back to nfsd4_cb_prepare() without first freeing the
slot, which causes a deadlock when nfsd41_cb_get_slot() gets called
a second time.

This patch therefore adds a boolean to track whether or not the
callback did pick up the slot, so that it can do the right thing
in these 2 cases.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-04-06 16:38:48 +02:00
prashantpaddune
3bca37f224 A750FXXU4CTBC 2020-03-27 21:51:54 +05:30