[ Upstream commit 6bbfe4e602691b90ac866712bd4c43c51e546a60 ]
Michael reported an issue with perf bench numa failing with binding to
cpu0 with '-0' option.
# perf bench numa mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZcm0 --thp 1 -M 1 -ddd
# Running 'numa/mem' benchmark:
# Running main, "perf bench numa numa-mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZcm0 --thp 1 -M 1 -ddd"
binding to node 0, mask: 0000000000000001 => -1
perf: bench/numa.c:356: bind_to_memnode: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
This happens when the cpu0 is not part of node0, which is the benchmark
assumption and we can see that's not the case for some powerpc servers.
Using correct node for cpu0 binding.
Reported-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190801142642.28004-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit bf561d3c13423fc54daa19b5d49dc15fafdb7acc ]
While cross building perf to the ARC architecture on a fedora 30 host,
we were failing with:
CC /tmp/build/perf/bench/numa.o
bench/numa.c: In function ‘worker_thread’:
bench/numa.c:1261:12: error: ‘RUSAGE_THREAD’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SIGEV_THREAD’?
getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD, &rusage);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
SIGEV_THREAD
bench/numa.c:1261:12: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
[perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$ /arc_gnu_2019.03-rc1_prebuilt_uclibc_le_archs_linux_install/bin/arc-linux-gcc --version | head -1
arc-linux-gcc (ARCv2 ISA Linux uClibc toolchain 2019.03-rc1) 8.3.1 20190225
[perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$
Trying to reproduce a report by Vineet, I noticed that, with just
cross-built zlib and numactl libraries, I ended up with the above
failure.
So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define, check for that and
numactl libraries, I ended up with the above failure.
So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define in the system headers,
check if it is defined in the 'perf bench numa' sources and define it if
not.
Now it builds and I have to figure out if the problem reported by Vineet
only takes place if we have libelf or some other library available.
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-2wb4r1gir9xrevbpq7qp0amk@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
