s390/bpf: fix lcgr instruction encoding
[ Upstream commit bb2d267c448f4bc3a3389d97c56391cb779178ae ] "masking, test in bounds 3" fails on s390, because BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_2, 0) ignores the top 32 bits of BPF_REG_2. The reason is that JIT emits lcgfr instead of lcgr. The associated comment indicates that the code was intended to emit lcgr in the first place, it's just that the wrong opcode was used. Fix by using the correct opcode. Fixes: 054623105728 ("s390/bpf: Add s390x eBPF JIT compiler backend") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ec99c6b6c4
commit
0d630586d6
|
@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
|
|||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_NEG: /* dst = -dst */
|
||||
/* lcgr %dst,%dst */
|
||||
EMIT4(0xb9130000, dst_reg, dst_reg);
|
||||
EMIT4(0xb9030000, dst_reg, dst_reg);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* BPF_FROM_BE/LE
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user