arm64: cpufeature: Fix feature comparison for CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG}

commit 147b9635e6347104b91f48ca9dca61eb0fbf2a54 upstream.

If CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} are 0b0000 then they must be interpreted to have
their architecturally maximum values, which defeats the use of
FTR_HIGHER_SAFE when sanitising CPU ID registers on heterogeneous
machines.

Introduce FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE so that these fields effectively
saturate at zero.

Fixes: 3c739b571084 ("arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4.y only
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Will Deacon 2019-08-05 18:13:08 +01:00 committed by prashantpaddune
parent c88e6c2af2
commit 064fe34afc
2 changed files with 10 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -48,9 +48,10 @@
/* CPU feature register tracking */ /* CPU feature register tracking */
enum ftr_type { enum ftr_type {
FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */ FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */
FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */ FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */
FTR_HIGHER_SAFE,/* Bigger value is safe */ FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe */
FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe, but 0 is biggest */
}; };
#define FTR_STRICT true /* SANITY check strict matching required */ #define FTR_STRICT true /* SANITY check strict matching required */

View File

@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ static struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = {
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 30, 1, 0), ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 30, 1, 0),
U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 29, 1, 1), /* DIC */ U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 29, 1, 1), /* DIC */
U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 1, 1), /* IDC */ U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 1, 1), /* IDC */
U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, 24, 4, 0), /* CWG */ U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, 24, 4, 0), /* CWG */
U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, 20, 4, 0), /* ERG */ U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, 20, 4, 0), /* ERG */
U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 1), /* DminLine */ U_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 16, 4, 1), /* DminLine */
/* /*
* Linux can handle differing I-cache policies. Userspace JITs will * Linux can handle differing I-cache policies. Userspace JITs will
@ -359,6 +359,10 @@ static s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new, s64 cur)
case FTR_LOWER_SAFE: case FTR_LOWER_SAFE:
ret = new < cur ? new : cur; ret = new < cur ? new : cur;
break; break;
case FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE:
if (!cur || !new)
break;
/* Fallthrough */
case FTR_HIGHER_SAFE: case FTR_HIGHER_SAFE:
ret = new > cur ? new : cur; ret = new > cur ? new : cur;
break; break;